Commentary: Civil Commitment Statutes—40 Years of Circumvention

Journal American Academy Psychiatry Law 38:365– 8, 2010: William H. Fisher, PhD, and Thomas Grisso, PhD

____________________________________________________

“Civil commitment statutes are in many ways social peculiarities. Like criminal codes, they allow the state to deprive individuals of liberty, but unlike those codes, commitment statutes, while more narrowly constructed now than a half century ago, are decidedly lacking in specificity regarding what behavior may or may not justify confinement. Instead, key components of those statutes, such as mental illness and dangerousness, are left to be defined largely on a case-by-case basis by clinicians charged with making decisions about involuntary hospitalization. In some cases, this vagueness has allowed significant latitude in the way a statute is applied and to whom. And often, variation in a given statute’s applications are driven, not so much by variance in the judgment of clinicians, as by a range of social, political, and even
economic factors.

Read the entire article by clicking on the SOURCE link below:

SOURCE: http://jaapl.org/content/jaapl/38/3/365.full.pdf

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: